It looks like you are using an older version of Internet Explorer which is not supported. We advise that you update your browser to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, or consider using other browsers such as Chrome, Firefox or Safari.

This website has been developed and funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Limited. This educational website is intended for UK healthcare professionals only.

If you are a member of the public, please click here

Little 'a', Big Factor

17.9M icon
32% icon
85% icon

There are an estimated 17.9 million people worldwide who die from cardiovascular diseases (CVD) a year.2 This represents on average 32% of all global deaths, and of those, 85% are due to heart attacks and strokes.3

Typical distribution of Lp(a) in the general population5

Elevated Lp(a) is highly prevalent

Typical distribution of Lp(a) in the general population

Unlike LDL-C Levels which have a normal distribution, Lp(a) levels are skewed in most populations.5 Elevated Lp(a) influences atherogenicity from birth1, Lp(a) is approximately 6-fold more atherogenic than LDL on a per particle basis10

Figure adapted from Nordestgaard BG, et al. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(23):2844–2853.

Elevated lipoprotein(a), also known as lipoprotein 'little a', or Lp(a), is a genetically determined and independent risk factor that increases cardiovascular disease risk.1,4 Lp(a) serves as a valuable indicator of susceptibility to CVD-related events and conditions.1,5

For example, individuals with elevated Lp(a) (>117 mg/dL) are 2.6 times more likely to experience a myocardial infarction (MI) compared to individuals with Lp(a) <5 mg/dL.6 An Lp(a) level of ~250 nmol/L (100 mg/dL) approximately doubles the risk of an atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) event, irrespective of an individual’s absolute risk at baseline according to research in 2022 and 2023.5

And yet, despite approximately 1 in 5 people worldwide having elevated Lp(a) levels,1 it is not routinely tested in day-to-day clinical practice.

The potential value of including Lp(a) testing in cardiovascular risk evaluation

There is an addressable gap in Lp(a) testing in the UK. The inclusion of Lp(a) testing could be beneficial from a clinical and patient perspective, as knowledge of Lp(a) levels can help to offer a clearer understanding of your patients’ overall CVD risk. It could:

  • enhance CVD risk prediction
  • enable reclassification of individuals or patients into higher risk categories who may otherwise not meet guideline criteria for lipid-lowering therapy11-14

More accurate risk assessment of ASCVD patients, particularly in those who have already experienced a CV event, can help to reduce a patient’s risk of a subsequent event and, in turn, reduce the significant burden of CVD across the NHS.15-17

Lp(a) testing may improve CVD risk assessment in primary and secondary prevention settings

cardiovascular risk assessment
  • One in three patients with very elevated Lp(a) levels* were reclassified into a higher primary prevention risk category
  • >50% of all patients with very elevated Lp(a) levels* were reclassified into a higher secondary prevention risk category

SCORE: Conroy et al. Eur Heart J 2003;24:987–1003; https://www.heartscore.org/en_GB  (Last accessed July 2024)

SMART: Dorresteijn et al. Heart 2013;99:866–872; https://u-prevent.com/calculators/smartScore (Last accessed July 2024);

*>99th percentile, mean Lp(a) of 460 nmol/L.

doctor and patient

Identification of elevated Lp(a)

There exists a great opportunity to implement Lp(a) testing during routine cholesterol checks. Testing once in a lifetime, particularly in those within the post-CV event population, could help healthcare professionals (HCP) to better understand their patients’ overall CVD risk, inform treatment intensification and management of global CVD risk factors, as well as identify a potential underlying genetic cause of CVD risk which could help provide a deeper understanding of premature events or family history. 

blood vial

Testing Lp(a) in your patients with CVD could help to accurately assess their risk of having another event, allowing appropriate and timely interventions to take place to improve patient outcomes.15-17

References:

  1. Enas EA, et al. Indian Heart J. 2019 Mar-Apr;71(2):99-112.
  2. World Health Organization. Cardiovascular diseases. Available at: https://www.who.int/health-topics/cardiovascular-diseases#tab=tab_1 [Last Accessed July 2024]
  3. World Health Organization. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds) [Last accessed July 2024]
  4. Reyes-Soffer et al. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2022;42:e48–e60.
  5. Kronenberg, et al. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(39):3925–3946.
  6. Kamstrup PR et al. JAMA. 2009;301(22):2331–2339.
  7. Tsimikas & Marcovina. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;80(9):934–946;
  8. Nordestgaard BG, et al. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(23):2844–2853.
  9. Afshar M, et al. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2016;36(12):2421–2423.
  10. Björnson E et al., J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024: 83(3):385-395.
  11. Willeit P, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(9):851–860;
  12. Afshar M, et al. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(18):e014711;
  13. Nurmohamed NS, et al. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2022;29(5):769–776;
  14. Bhatia HS, et al. Atherosclerosis. 2023;381:117217.
  15. Verbeek et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69 (11): 1513-1515.
  16. Wesorick et al. The American Journal of Medicine (2005) 118, 1413.e1-1413.e9.
  17. Mach et al. Eur Soc of Cardiol. 41: 111-188. 2020.

UK | July 2024 | 443353